Going From Threat Intel to Threat Hunt: Threat Hunting for Nation State Actors

Building an Effective Threat Hunting Strategy Against Nation-State Threats

Introduction

In an era of increasingly sophisticated cyber threats, particularly those stemming from nation-state actors, organizations must adopt a proactive and structured approach to cyber defense. This guide outlines key steps in developing a threat hunting strategy that leverages both technology and collaboration to protect critical systems—especially those tied to national defense.

Step 1: Interpreting Threat Intelligence Effectively

Every successful threat hunt begins with understanding the latest threat intelligence. Reports from organizations like CISA (Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency) provide insights into how advanced adversaries operate. However, these reports often require deeper analysis to translate high-level recommendations into specific actions that security teams can take.

Step 2: Visual Mapping of Adversary Tactics

Security teams can gain clarity by visualizing attack patterns using platforms such as Miro. This process involves breaking down the attack into components known as tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs), such as:

  • Attack Techniques: Examples include brute-force attacks on Microsoft 365 or phishing campaigns using deceptive URLs.

  • Adversary Behaviors: These may involve stealing credentials, moving laterally within the network, or deploying stealthy tools.

  • Indicators: Teams can monitor specific signals on the host or network level, including unusual login attempts or irregular data transfers.

Visualizing these patterns enables teams to better understand how an attack progresses and to spot weak points within their defenses.

Why Visualization Matters in Threat Intelligence

Turning complex data into visual formats enhances a team’s ability to analyze and respond quickly. Here’s how visual modeling helps:

  • Faster Understanding: Graphics reduce cognitive load, allowing teams to understand complex threats more easily.

  • Quicker Decisions: Clear visuals enable rapid responses, which is critical during an active threat.

  • Improved Communication: Visual aids allow teams of varied expertise to collaborate more effectively.

  • Better Storytelling: Diagrams and flows help convey the impact of threats to stakeholders in a way that reports alone often can’t.

Ultimately, visualization serves as a bridge between raw data and actionable insight.

Why Attackers Use Multi-Layered Strategies

Sophisticated attackers typically don’t rely on a single method. They employ multiple tactics simultaneously or in sequence to improve their chances of bypassing defenses.

  • Evading Detection: When multiple techniques are used, it becomes harder to trace and block every entry point.

  • Adding Complexity: Layered attacks create ambiguity, complicating analysis and response.

  • Adapting on the Fly: Attackers can shift approaches in real time, depending on the resistance they face.

For example, they may begin with phishing to gain access, escalate privileges using stolen credentials, and then move laterally to sensitive systems. This chain of actions allows them to achieve objectives such as data exfiltration or service disruption more effectively.

Understanding “Attack Flows” and the MITRE ATT&CK Framework

Attack Flows are structured sequences that illustrate how a threat actor may link various TTPs in an actual attack. Based on the MITRE ATT&CK framework, these flows help security professionals dissect complex campaigns.

  • Deconstructing Attacks: By outlining each stage of an attack, teams can prepare more targeted responses.

  • Building Awareness: Visual flows help identify patterns, making it easier to anticipate future behavior.

  • Tool Integration: These flows can be embedded into platforms like Splunk or XDR tools, enabling quicker detection.

  • Training Value: They serve as real-world examples for simulation and response exercises.

Through these flows, organizations can evolve from reactive defense to strategic anticipation.

Step 3: Identifying and Using Key Observables

Key observables are specific data points that indicate malicious activity. Understanding these indicators is essential to detecting threats early. Some examples include:

  • System-Level Logs: Windows firewall events, PowerShell commands, or Active Directory activity.

  • Network Signals: Unusual DNS queries, email anomalies, or authentication attempts over SMB.

  • Behavioral Clues: Patterns like sudden access to confidential files or abnormal privilege changes.

A notable technique to watch for is NTDS.DIT credential theft, where attackers target Active Directory for password data. When observables are linked across multiple stages, they help build a narrative that can inform rapid defensive action.

Step 4: Recognizing Defensive Blind Spots

No monitoring system is perfect. There are inherent limitations that defenders need to be aware of:

  • Log Limitations: Some logs, like SMB authentication data, may show access attempts but lack context or detail.

  • Stealth Tactics: Attackers using native tools (e.g., PowerShell) may go undetected by signature-based defenses.

  • Forensic Gaps: Temporary file changes or memory-only artifacts are harder to catch in real time.

To compensate, teams must analyze a diverse range of data sources:

  • Domain Controller Logs: Crucial for identifying abnormal login behavior.

  • Cloud Infrastructure Logs: Key for spotting unauthorized access in platforms like Azure or AWS.

  • Disk and Memory Forensics: Deeper analysis to uncover threats that avoid detection by traditional tools.

Step 5: Emphasizing Collaboration and Ongoing Learning

One of the strongest defenses in cybersecurity is community collaboration. Sharing experiences, tactics, and detection strategies helps teams stay ahead of evolving threats.

  • Shared Workspaces: Platforms like Miro allow multiple analysts to contribute to a single threat model.

  • Hashtag Campaigns: Social media tags like #ThreatHunting foster public exchange of insights.

  • Open Intelligence Networks: Community-driven repositories of indicators and tactics benefit everyone involved.

Defending against nation-state threats requires more than just technical tools—it demands a unified effort built on trust and transparency.

Conclusion: Turning Insight into Action

While nation-state actors may have advanced capabilities, they leave traces that can be detected. By applying structured threat hunting techniques—visual modeling, behavioral analysis, and collaborative intelligence sharing—security professionals can anticipate threats, minimize risks, and stay a step ahead of adversaries.

Threat hunting is not just a technical discipline—it’s a mindset that blends precision, creativity, and community. When defenders work together and continuously evolve, even the most persistent threats can be neutralized.

Be sure to watch Dan Gunter’s Tech Talk “Going From Threat Intel to Threat Hunt: Threat Hunting for Nation State Actors.

See how Insane Cyber transforms security

Our products are designed to work with
you and keep your network protected.